土超比赛双方在禁区里打架，裁判未吹停比赛导致主队打入空门（土超禁区内爆发冲突，裁判未鸣哨，主队趁机打进空门）

Analyzing a match incident

The user mentioned an incident in the Turkish Super League where players fought in the penalty area, and the referee didn’t stop the match, allowing the home team to score. It seems they might want an analysis or explanation of the rules surrounding such situations. I’ll clarify the rules against violent conduct, mass confrontation, and the appropriate actions a referee should take, including potential disciplinary sanctions and how the game should be restarted.Examining referee protocols

When the ball is in play and an offense happens, the referee should stop the match if necessary. If there’s violent conduct between players in the penalty area, the restart type depends on the situation. For direct offenses against players, it’s usually a direct free kick, or a penalty if it occurs in the area. During a mass brawl, the referee would stop play and deal with the situation, restarting with a free kick or, if both sides are involved, a dropped ball.Clarifying drop ball rules

According to Law 12, if players commit offenses simultaneously, a dropped ball is typically used unless the offenses have the same restart. If both teams commit violent conduct with equal severity, we need to assess the offenses based on their sanctions and restart types. A penalty kick is a type of direct free kick, so they are considered equivalent in that respect. If everything else is equal, using a dropped ball might be the correct approach.Interpreting simultaneous offenses

I need to clarify that if players commit multiple offenses at the same time, the referee punishes the most serious one. So, no dropped ball in these cases; I should assess the seriousness of each offense. In a brawl in Team A's penalty area, if defenders commit violent conduct, it results in a penalty kick for attackers. If attackers commit the same in the area, the defenders receive a direct free kick. A penalty is also considered more serious based on the restart so I need to dive into the context.Summarizing officiating laws

I need to outline the relevant laws: Law 5 (referee authority), Law 12 (fouls/misconduct), and Law 8 (restarts). In the decision tree, if only defenders show violent conduct in their penalty area while attackers have a clear opportunity, the referee might apply advantage, and the goal could stand. If both teams engage in violence, play should stop immediately, show red cards, and restart with the most serious offense. Finally, if violence happens after a goal has been scored, the goal is invalidated only if the scoring team committed an offense. However, the keeper leaving the goal doesn't affect validity. For the case mentioned, play should be halted immediately. If both teams committed offenses before the ball crossed the line, the goal is canceled, but I’d need specifics to confirm any decisions. If needed, I can help with a clip or timing for review.